What TV doesn't, print can't; we deliver.
What TV doesn't, print can't; we deliver.
Josh Hazlewood’s comments after the 295-run loss to India have sparked concerns of a rift within the Australian camp, drawing heavy criticism from media and former players.
NEW DELHI: Australia’s cricketing pride took a hit after suffering a humiliating 295-run loss to India in the first Test at Perth’s Optus Stadium. While Indian players basked in the glory of their dominant victory, the Australian camp found itself under a harsh spotlight from its own media and former players. This defeat, however, wasn’t just about the loss on the field. It unveiled deeper issues within the team, sparking concerns about their unity and resilience.
Josh Hazlewood’s post-match remarks have become a lightning rod for criticism. In what seemed like an attempt to deflect responsibility, Hazlewood pointed fingers at the team’s batting lineup. “You probably have to ask one of the batters that question. I’m sort of relaxing and trying to get a bit of treatment, looking mostly to the next Test,” he said when asked about the team’s performance. His words did little to ease tensions; instead, they highlighted cracks within the Australian dressing room.
ALSO READ: India wins Perth Test; Bumrah’s first as captain, India’s first win at Optus Stadium
Australian legend Adam Gilchrist was quick to weigh in, suggesting Hazlewood’s comments hinted at a deeper issue. “That to me tells me there is potentially a divided change room. I don’t know if there is. I might be reading too much into that,” he remarked, clearly troubled by the pacer’s choice of words. His concerns resonated with cricket fans, who are used to seeing the Australian team known for its fierce unity, especially after tough losses.
Former England captain Michael Vaughan echoed Gilchrist’s sentiments, expressing shock over Hazlewood’s willingness to separate the team into batters and bowlers publicly. “I’ve never heard an Australian come out and divide the camp into batters and bowlers,” Vaughan said, hinting that such public blame games are rare in the Australian cricket culture.
David Warner, another senior player, also criticized the handling of the situation. Warner emphasized the importance of senior players acting as a unifying force within the team. “As a senior player, you have a duty of care. All the batters are thinking about going out and batting. Comments like these only add to the pressure,” Warner said, emphasizing that leadership should inspire confidence, not cause rifts.
Ravi Shastri, India’s former head coach, believes this internal strife could give India a mental edge moving forward. “These comments highlight cracks in Australia’s internal cohesion,” Shastri observed, suggesting that such revelations could demoralize the Australian team while emboldening their opponents.
The Australian team now faces more than just a technical challenge in the upcoming Test. Rebuilding trust and unity will be critical. If the camaraderie that once defined Australian cricket continues to wane, their journey ahead could be more about mending internal fences than winning matches.
