What TV doesn't, print can't; we deliver.
What TV doesn't, print can't; we deliver.
The tragic death of an MBBS student in Gujarat due to alleged ragging by seniors has once again spotlighted the grim reality of hazing in Indian educational institutions. Despite stringent laws, judicial directives, and repeated awareness campaigns, ragging continues to rear its ugly head, endangering the safety and well-being of students across the country. This incident serves as a chilling reminder of how inadequate implementation and oversight render existing anti-ragging mechanisms ineffective.
Ragging, euphemistically termed a “rite of passage,” has devolved into a brutal practice characterized by psychological harassment, physical abuse, and, in extreme cases, fatalities. Recognizing its devastating impact, the Supreme Court of India outlawed ragging in 2009, directing all educational institutions to implement anti-ragging measures. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has since established guidelines mandating anti-ragging committees, helplines, and periodic inspections. Despite these efforts, enforcement remains inconsistent, and many institutions treat complaints as minor inconveniences or, worse, sweep them under the carpet to protect their reputations.
The crux of the problem lies in a systemic failure to prioritize student welfare. Institutions are often reluctant to acknowledge the prevalence of ragging for fear of attracting negative publicity. Complaints from victims are either ignored or diluted, discouraging others from coming forward. Moreover, the anti-ragging mechanisms that do exist, such as helplines or grievance redressal committees, are underutilized due to a lack of awareness, poor accessibility, or mistrust in the system’s efficacy.
Another significant issue is the cultural normalization of ragging. Many seniors view it as an initiation ritual that fosters bonding, while administrators and faculty often dismiss it as harmless fun. This normalization trivializes the trauma suffered by victims, many of whom face long-term psychological scars, social withdrawal, or even suicidal tendencies. The Gujarat incident is a grim testament to the catastrophic consequences of such neglect.
What can be done to address this pervasive issue? First, institutions must take a zero-tolerance approach to ragging, ensuring that all incidents are treated with the seriousness they deserve. Mandatory orientation programs for new students should include detailed sessions on anti-ragging laws and reporting mechanisms. Simultaneously, seniors and faculty members must be educated on the ethical and legal consequences of ragging.
Second, the UGC and state authorities must strengthen monitoring frameworks. Surprise inspections, strict audits of anti-ragging committees, and independent third-party reviews can ensure compliance with anti-ragging norms. Helplines must be made more accessible and widely publicized, and complaints must be addressed promptly and impartially.
Third, a robust support system is crucial for victims. Counseling services and safe spaces must be readily available, enabling affected students to seek help without fear of retaliation or stigma. Legal safeguards protecting whistleblowers can encourage reporting of ragging incidents.
Lastly, there must be exemplary punishment for perpetrators and negligent administrators. Holding individuals and institutions accountable will send a strong message that ragging will not be tolerated under any circumstances.
