US President Donald Trump hosts his first cabinet meeting with Elon Musk in attendance as he sits next to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
US President Donald Trump hosts his first cabinet meeting with Elon Musk in attendance as he sits next to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Summary

The Trump administration announced a significant reduction in foreign aid, cutting more than 90% of USAID contracts and slashing $60 billion in global assistance. This move marks a dramatic rollback of U.S. development and humanitarian aid efforts, with far-reaching consequences for global health, education, and economic development.

NEW DELHI: On Wednesday, the Trump administration announced a significant reduction in foreign aid, cutting more than 90% of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) contracts and slashing $60 billion in global assistance. This decision marks a dramatic rollback of U.S. development and humanitarian aid efforts, signaling a shift in the countryโ€™s foreign policy.

 

President Donald Trump announced during a press conference at the White House, emphasizing the need to prioritize domestic issues and reduce government spending. โ€œWe are putting America first,โ€ Trump stated. โ€œOur focus should be on rebuilding our own country and addressing the needs of our citizens.โ€

 

 

Elon Musk called USAID's spending a "crazy waste" of taxpayer money.
Elon Musk called USAIDโ€™s spending a โ€œcrazy wasteโ€ of taxpayer money.

 

The decision was influenced by key figures within the administration, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Elon Musk, who leads the Department of Government Efficiency. Both have been vocal critics of foreign aid, arguing that it advances a liberal agenda and is a waste of taxpayer money. The cuts were detailed in an internal memo obtained by The Associated Press and court filings related to ongoing legal battles with nonprofits and contractors affected by the funding freeze.

 

The cuts will have far-reaching consequences, affecting thousands of USAID-funded projects worldwide. The administration plans to eliminate 5,800 of 6,200 multiyear USAID contracts, totaling $54 billion, and 4,100 of 9,100 State Department grants, amounting to $4.4 billion. This reduction will significantly shrink USAIDโ€™s operations, leaving only a handful of projects intact.

 

 

ALSO READ: Trumpโ€™s $5M Gold Card visa: impact on Indian immigrants, EB-5 Program

 

 

The rollback of U.S. development and humanitarian aid is expected to have severe implications for global health, education, and economic development. Programs that provide essential services, such as the Presidentโ€™s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance (BHA), will be particularly affected. The cessation of critical foreign aid will exacerbate existing humanitarian crises, destabilize fragile regions, and undermine decades of progress in development.

 

A flag waved at the US Agency for International Development, headquarters in Washington, DC, the United States.
A flag waved at the US Agency for International Development, headquarters in Washington, DC, the United States.

 

The announcement has sparked widespread criticism from humanitarian organizations and international development experts. Critics argue that the cuts will harm vulnerable communities and damage the United Statesโ€™ reputation as a reliable partner in global development. โ€œThis decision is a step backward for U.S. foreign policy,โ€ said a spokesperson for a leading humanitarian organization. โ€œIt undermines our efforts to promote stability and prosperity around the world.โ€

 

The Trump administrationโ€™s decision to slash USAID foreign aid contracts and cut $60 billion in global assistance represents a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy. While the administration argues that the cuts are necessary to prioritize domestic issues, the impact on global development and humanitarian efforts will be profound and long-lasting. As the world grapples with the consequences of these cuts, the debate over the role of foreign aid in U.S. policy is likely to continue.