Representative Image

Summary

NEW DELHI: The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled in favour of a family courtโ€™s verdict denying a manโ€™s divorce application, calling for the eradication of โ€œdiscriminationโ€ฆ

NEW DELHI: The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled in favour of a family courtโ€™s verdict denying a manโ€™s divorce application, calling for the eradication of โ€œdiscrimination based on skin colourโ€.

Earlier, the husband had claimed โ€˜crueltyโ€™ being meted out to him on the pretext of his wife deserting him. However, the court ruled in the wifeโ€™s favour as she stated that she was insulted regularly and was thrown out by the husbandโ€™s family because of her dark complexion.

The court then highlighted that through its judgement it could not posit an โ€œincentive to promote a (colourist) mindset). โ€œThe human race needs to change the dialogue at homeโ€ฆ which may not promote the fairness preference of skin,โ€ a bench of Justice Gautam Bhaduri and Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari said.โ€

During the verdict, the court also referred to studies on the role complexion plays in the selection of marital partners. The HC also referred to the โ€œlong-runningโ€ debate on fairness creams, which was the subject of an amendment in the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, in 2020.

Also Read: Future of female wrestlers bleak: Sakshi Mallik retires as Brij Bhushanโ€™s aide becomes WFI Prezโ€

The study further indicatesโ€ฆ dark-skinned (women) were rated lower than their counterparts, and the majority of skin-lightening cosmetics target women. They are likely to portray a dark-skinned woman as under-confident and insecureโ€ฆ unable to secure success in life,โ€ the court noted.

As a result, the court highlighted that they would not incentivise the husbandโ€™s actions which would enable others to discriminate against their spouse. โ€œTherefore, the incentive cannot be given to a husband to promote such a mindset of the society for preference of light skin over dark. We are of the view that no ground of cruelty, or desertion, has been made out by the husband to get the decree of divorce,โ€ the court noted.

The married couple had been married since 2005, the verdict was passed in November.