Bangladeshi third umpire Sharfuddoula in spotlight after Jaiswal decision

Bangladesh’s Sharfuddoula, officiating as the third umpire, overturned an on-field not-out decision against Indian opener Yashasvi Jaiswal.

| Updated: 30 December, 2024 3:10 pm IST
Indian opener Yashasvi Jaiswal dismissal sparks controversy.
Indian opener Yashasvi Jaiswal dismissal sparks controversy. (Photo Illustration: Swastik Sharma)

NEW DELHI: The third umpire’s controversial decision during the Melbourne Test between India and Australia has sparked heated debates among cricket fans and experts alike.

 

Bangladesh’s Sharfuddoula, officiating as the third umpire, overturned an on-field not-out decision against Indian opener Yashasvi Jaiswal, citing a potential edge that left many baffled.

 

The contentious moment occurred during India’s second innings. Jaiswal, who has been a key performer for the team, was adjudged not out by the on-field umpire after a caught-behind appeal from Australia’s bowlers.

 

Indian opener Yashasvi Jaiswal's dismissal in the boxing day test against Australia.
Indian opener Yashasvi Jaiswal’s dismissal in the boxing day test against Australia. (Photo Illustration: Swastik Sharma)

 

 

However, upon reviewing the decision, Sharfuddoula overturned the call, pointing to a faint mark on UltraEdge. Replays, however, failed to conclusively show a spike correlating with the ball passing the bat, leading to confusion and outrage.

 

ALSO READ: Calls for Sharma, Kohli retirement get shriller as India loses Melbourne Test

 

The decision has drawn sharp criticism from fans and cricketing pundits, with many accusing the third umpire of inconsistency, social media platforms were flooded with clips of the incident, accompanied by hashtags like #JusticeForJaiswal and #UmpiringStandards.

 

Indian cricket legend Sunil Gavaskar also weighed in, stating, “Decisions like these shake players’ confidence and can change the course of a match.”

 

Former cricketers and analysts have questioned Sharfuddoula’s judgment, emphasizing the importance of clear and indisputable evidence in overturning on-field decisions.

 

Some argued that UltraEdge technology, while useful, should not be the sole determinant, especially in cases lacking visual confirmation.

 

India’s loss in the Melbourne Test has only amplified scrutiny over the decision, fans believe moments like these underscore the need for higher standards of officiating in high-stakes matches.

 

ALSO READ: India fights back, keeps australia’s lead at 333 in boxing day test

 

With the World Test Championship points at stake, the controversial dismissal of Jaiswal has been highlighted as a turning point in the game, the International Cricket Council (ICC) has yet to issue an official statement regarding the incident.

 

However, the controversy has reignited calls for better training and accountability for umpires in international cricket, some experts suggest introducing a review system for third umpire decisions to ensure fairness and transparency.

 

As the cricketing world debates the incident, one thing is certain: Sharfuddoula’s decision has left a lasting impression on the Melbourne Test, and the conversation around umpiring standards will only grow louder.

Also Read Story

Over 73% of India’s teachers untrained in computer-based teaching, says UDISE

NSUI urges PM Modi to name DU college after Manmohan Singh

Shubman Gill, Gujarat Titans players caught in scam 

New York nightclub shooting: 10 injured in tragic attack at Amazura