What TV doesn't, print can't; we deliver.
What TV doesn't, print can't; we deliver.
Arrest Warrant issued against former cricketer Robin Uthappa over provident fund fraud
NEW DELHI: An arrest warrant has been issued against former Indian cricketer Robin Uthappa for allegedly failing to deposit provident fund contributions deducted from employees’ salaries at a Bengaluru-based clothing company he oversees. Uthappa, who serves as the director of Centaurus Lifestyle Brands Pvt Ltd, has been accused of defaulting on dues amounting to nearly Rs 24 lakh.
The warrant, issued on December 4 by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Sadakshari Gopal Reddy, states that Uthappa has until December 27 to clear the outstanding amount. If he fails to comply, authorities have directed the police to arrest him and return the warrant.
The company reportedly owes Rs 23,36,602 in damages to its employees. The notice highlights the significant impact on workers, with officials stating, “Due to non-remittances of dues, this office is unable to settle the Provident Fund Accounts of the poor workers.”
The allegations against Uthappa stem from his role as the company’s director, where it is claimed that provident fund contributions were deducted from employees’ salaries but not deposited into their accounts. The issue has drawn sharp criticism, given the severe implications for employees’ financial security.
READ ALSO: Complete bans firecrackers to combat severe air pollution
Robin Uthappa, 39, was a prominent figure in Indian cricket, known for his role in the 2007 T20 World Cup-winning squad. Over his international career, Uthappa represented India in 59 matches, scoring 1,183 runs in 54 ODIs, including seven half-centuries. He also had a distinguished stint in the Indian Premier League (IPL), playing for top franchises and earning a reputation as a reliable batsman.
While Uthappa is yet to respond publicly to the allegations, the case has sparked discussions about corporate responsibility and the financial well-being of employees. Authorities remain firm in their directive to recover the dues by the stipulated deadline.
The matter underscores the importance of timely remittance of employee benefits and the legal consequences of failing to uphold such obligations.
